Connect with us

Politics

‘Thoughtful response’: Politicians, former FO officials react to operation Marg Bar Sarmachar

Published

on

  • Iran’s attack on Pakistani sovereignty was unexpected, says Sherry.
  • Need for joint strategy to deal with terrorism, Khawaja Asif says.
  • Former foreign secretary says Pakistan acted patiently.

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) leader Senator Sherry Rehman Thursday termed Pakistan’s response to Tehran’s “unprovoked” attack a “thoughtful response”, as the country’s army launches strikes on terrorist hideouts operating in the Iranian territories. 

Speaking with Geo News, the senior politician said Iran’s attack on Pakistani sovereignty was unexpected.

After Iran launched a surprise attack in Balochistan claiming to target a militant outfit late Tuesday night, Pakistan’s military targeted terrorist hideouts inside the Iranian border today.

Iran’s attack, which the Foreign Office termed “unprovoked and “unacceptable”, left two children dead and injured three girls, stating that it violated the country’s sovereignty.

Pakistan’s retaliation, however, killed a number of terrorists during the intelligence-based operation — codenamed “Marg Bar Sarmachar”, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement today.

“This morning Pakistan undertook a series of highly coordinated and specifically targeted precision military strikes against terrorist hideouts in Siestan-o-Baluchistan province of Iran,” the FO mentioned.

“If Iran had any concerns, it should have informed Pakistan,” Senator Rehman insisted, highlighting the need for restraint by both countries.

She maintained that Pakistan has old ties with Iran and there is a need to improve relations. However, she also acknowledged that such skirmishes along the Pakistan-Iran border have been taking place for many years.

“It would be better if the two countries do not allow this kind of conflict to escalate further,” she added.

‘Fitting diplomatic and military steps’

Former prime minister Shehbaz Sharif asserted that Pakistan’s reaction was to ensure its territorial integrity and keeping the well-being of the citizens “paramount”.

Taking to X — formerly Twitter — the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz president wrote: “Pakistan has taken fitting diplomatic and military steps for peace and security. We seek peace between our two neighbourly countries but reserve the right to defend ourselves.”

He also acknowledged the action taken by the military and saluted the “valiant armed forces” for carrying out Operation Marg Bar Sarmachar.

‘Need to avoid escalation in tensions’

Former defence minister and senior politician Khawaja Muhammad Asif said Pakistan must avoid escalation in tensions with Iran.

“Efforts should be made to prevent further deterioration of relations with Iran,” he insisted, adding that the country’s ties with Tehran were “very good” during the previous coalition government.

Pakistan, he added, played an active role in resolving the conflict between Saudi Arabia and Iran. “Pakistan and Iran should make a joint strategy to deal with terrorism.”

The ex-minister said Baloch separatist movements are going on in both Pakistan and Iran.

“Pakistan and Iran need to jointly deal with these movements,” the senior politico maintained.

‘Pakistan capable of responding to external threats’

Commenting on the rising tensions between the two countries, former foreign minister Hina Rabbani Khan found Iran’s actions “shocking”, highlighting that they took place in the background of a “stable relationship with a neighbour that it shares a 900 km border with”.

Khar, on X, said Iran’s strike inside Pakistan “were irrational, illegal and escalatory. It seems whoever authorised it had not thought through”.

She added that Islamabad has repeatedly conveyed its concerns about terrorist hideouts in Iran, but relied on diplomatic solutions to ensure an amicable resolution of the issue.

“However, Pakistan preferred to rely on diplomatic solutions and create mechanisms where both country’s could address each other’s concerns within the framework of intl law and UN charter.”

The former minister also stressed that the region cannot afford another escalation.

“Pakistan’s action today show that it will never choose to escalate but has both the will and the capacity to respond to external threats and any attack on its sovereignty,” she opined.

‘High-level communication needed’

Meanwhile, former foreign secretary Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry, in an interview with Geo News, said Pakistan has proven its capability to retaliate to attacks on its soil, after today’s response to Iran.

“After the attack by Iran, Pakistan acted patiently,” he opined.

Chaudhry insisted that the governments of both countries must now conduct high-level communication to ensure avoiding such instances in the future.

“The Iranian government should have made a statement within 24 hours of the attack to defuse the situation,” he explained.

‘Iran displayed irresponsibility’

Former ambassador Abdul Basit, when speaking with Geo News, said Pakistan and Iran must resolve the matter through diplomacy.

The former envoy said Pakistan’s western neighbour have displayed “irresponsibility” by attacking Pakistan

“After the Iranian attack on Pakistan, there was grief and anger among the people, as Iran attacked and challenged the sovereignty of Pakistan,” he said.

‘Syria, Iraq, Pakistan had nothing to do with Kerman terror attack’

Trita Parsi, the co-founder and executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said he is “stunned by the absolute idiocy of Tehran striking Pakistan.

Taking to X, formerly Twiter, Parsi — an expert on Iran’s foreign policy — wrote: “Tehran has bombed targets in three countries, none of which had anything to do with the Kerman terror attack.”

He also wrote about Iran’s attack on Syria and said that the building on which Tehran launched the missile was empty. “No evidence has been provided that Mossad was in the Irbil building.”

Meanwhile, he also insisted that the “Al Qaeda offshoot in Pakistan was not involved in the Kerman attack, by Iran’s own admission”.

Parsi added that Pakistan is a nuclear power. “It is obviously not going to tolerate being bombed. It has now retaliated and struck Iran. Hopefully, that’s the end of it.”

The expert maintained that Tehran suffers from the “do-something” syndrome, which “so often causes Washington to shoot itself in the foot and make matters worse.”

Latest News

Sheikh Rasheed says PTI and government negotiations won’t provide any results.

Published

on

By

Sheikh Rasheed voiced his worries about the nation’s ongoing political dilemma while speaking outside the Anti-Terrorism Court.

According to Sheikh Rasheed, a committee was established to negotiate, but the process has not produced any tangible results. In order to emphasize the seriousness of the situation, he said, “Political conditions are extremely bad.”

He made the joke, “Even after war, if negotiations fail, then it will all come down to judo karate,” in reference to the next steps.

“Everyone there prays for Pakistan’s betterment,” Sheikh Rasheed, who had returned from Saudi Arabia, said. He emphasized the necessity for the nation’s circumstances to improve and stabilize.

Assad Qaiser, a former speaker and PTI leader, had earlier called on Speaker Ayaz Sadiq of the National Assembly to discuss the official start of talks with the government.

The two leaders shared their opinions on bringing parties together on matters of national importance and reducing political tensions and conflict.

“I will persuade my people, you persuade the hardliners in your party,” Ayaz Sadiq said to Assad Qaiser.

The party’s founder is in jail, and the PTI leadership has asked to meet with him. “We will continue to confer with him,” Assad Qaiser declared.

Earlier, PTI leader Shaukat Yousafzai stated that if the discussions don’t begin, a campaign of civil disobedience will begin on December 14.

Speaking to the media Regarding the meetings, Yousafzai claimed that the government ministers were making insincere remarks.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Bushra Bibi maintains bail as the IHC concludes the FIA’s petition.

Published

on

By

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) conducted a hearing about the Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) plea for the revocation of Bushra Bibi’s bail.

The court, led by Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb, rejected the FIA’s petition during the hearing.

Judicial Proceedings

Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb sought information regarding Bushra Bibi’s location, to which her attorney, Barrister Salman Safdar, affirmed her attendance in court.

The judge urged the counsel to regard the matters with gravity, underscoring the necessity of adherence to trial protocols.

The court sought details about instances where Bushra Bibi had been exempted from attending trial hearings and clarified that if the High Court grants bail and the accused fails to appear, the trial court holds the authority to cancel the bail.

Justice Aurangzeb assured that such actions would not amount to contempt of the High Court’s order.

Based on these considerations, the court closed the proceedings and dismissed the FIA’s plea.

Continue Reading

Latest News

The Supreme Court has granted the appeal of the PTI founder for a judicial probe into the events of May 9.

Published

on

By

The Supreme Court has officially accepted the plea submitted by the PTI chairman for a judicial probe into the events of May 9 for a comprehensive hearing.

The constitutional bench of the Supreme Court annulled the registrar’s office’s objections to the petition and instructed the office to allocate a case number and arrange the hearing.

The PTI chairman was represented by prominent attorney Hamid Khan, who appeared in court to argue for the petition’s admission.

The Lahore Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) already convicted Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan in connection with the incidents on May 9 and denied his bail on eight distinct counts.

The court’s finding was delivered in a six-page written order by ATC Judge Manzar Ali Gul.

The written ruling emphasized substantial evidence against the PTI founder, comprising audio and visual recordings of his directives to incite violence.

The court observed that witnesses had provided testimony on the conspiracy planned by Imran Khan at Zaman Park, where he purportedly strategized for his possible arrest by intending to disrupt state functions via his supporters.

Imran Khan’s legal counsel contended that he was in custody at the time of the incidents, proposing that bail be granted in accordance with precedents where bail was awarded in like circumstances following detention.

Nevertheless, the court rejected this argument, underscoring that the case’s nature was not a trifling issue of conspiracy or incitement.

The prosecution established that Mr. Khan had explicitly incited assaults on military and governmental facilities and had galvanized both his commanders and supporters to adhere to his directives.

The decision additionally cited the Lahore High Court’s finding regarding a prior release granted to Ijaz Chaudhry, highlighting Imran Khan’s involvement in the conspiracy. The court dismissed the defense’s challenge over the prosecution’s lack of specificity concerning the date, time, or location of the purported conspiracy, affirming that the scheme was allegedly devised on May 7 and May 9 at Zaman Park.

The prosecution asserts that undercover police officers, masquerading as PTI supporters, intercepted discussions outlining the scheme.

Continue Reading

Trending