Connect with us

Sports

Pakistan evaluating World Cup participation in India

Published

on

  • Pakistan’s participation in World Cup linked to govt approval.
  • FO says India’s policy of not playing in Pakistan is disappointing.
  • Green shirts last toured neighbouring country in 2012.

Amid doubts of a pullout from ICC World Cup 2023, the Foreign Ministry has said it was “evaluating all aspects” of Pakistan’s participation in this year’s 50-overs mega event in India.

Despite the stalemate over the venue for Asia Cup 2023 has ended, doubts continue to cast a shadow over Pakistan’s involvement in the World Cup 2023 in October-November. 

India’s stubbornness over Pakistan’s hosting of Asia Cup 2023 kept its hanging in the balance for over a month, as it refused to visit the country for the regional cricket tournament. In response, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) had threatened to pull out of World Cup 2023, scheduled in India.

The matter was resolved as the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) greenlit PCB’s hybrid model for Asia Cup earlier this month, while the foreign ministry said Pakistan’s participation in World Cup was under evaluation.

Foreign ministry spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch said Pakistan was of the view that “politics should not be mixed with sports”.

“India’s policy of not playing cricket in Pakistan is disappointing,” Baloch said in Islamabad on Thursday.

“We are observing and evaluating all aspects relating to our participation in the World Cup including the security situation for Pakistani cricketers and we will offer our views to PCB (Pakistan Cricket Board) in due course.”

Doubts over Pakistan’s participation has meant that the dates and venues for the World Cup are yet to be confirmed with just over three months left before the start of the tournament.

It may be noted that the Men in Blue have not toured Pakistan since 2008 due to strained relations between the two countries. The last bilateral series between the arch-rivals took place in 2012, when Pakistan toured India for limited-overs matches.

Since then, the two countries have played each other only in multi-team events at neutral venues over the last decade.

Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari was among the foreign ministers who travelled to India’s Goa last month for a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting, becoming the first senior Pakistani leader to visit India in nine years.

Latest News

It is probable that Rawalpindi Stadium will not host the Champions Trophy.

Published

on

By

The 2025 ICC Champions Trophy is expected to be held at three different locations instead of the Rawalpindi Cricket Stadium, as broadcasters suggest due to financial and logistical issues.

The competition has reportedly proven tough to broadcast from four locations, with worries expressed regarding higher costs and logistical challenges for the fourth location. As such, Karachi, Lahore, and Dubai are being contemplated as the event’s main locations.

Today is anticipated to see the release of the Champions Trophy’s official schedule. Final judgments will depend on an agreement that the International Cricket Council (ICC) is currently reviewing.

India and Pakistan agree on a neutral venue standard.
India and Pakistan’s cricket boards are said to have agreed on a “fusion formula,” which would allow the two long-standing adversaries to compete in ICC events without having to stage matches in each other’s nations. This is a huge move.

This agreement states that until 2027, Pakistan will play its matches in India in neutral locations, and India will reciprocate for events played in Pakistan. This deal covers the forthcoming ICC competitions, like as the Asia Cup in 2025 and the T20 World Cup in 2026, which India will host.

It is anticipated that the ICC will soon formalize and approve the deal.

Although it is a disappointment for local supporters, the decision to not use Rawalpindi as a location is in line with the practical needs of international broadcasters, as the Champions Trophy schedule is about to be revealed.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Following Gillespie’s resignation, Pakistan’s interim baseball coach was Aaqib Javed.

Published

on

By

Details indicate that Jason Gillespie’s resignation as baseball coach of the national team was explicitly communicated by the board.

As the red-ball coach for the next Test series against South Africa, Javed will assume responsibilities.

Gillespie reportedly chose to step down earlier today.

Details reveal that Gillespie had declined to visit South Africa, stating that he had personal reasons for not going. Tim Nelson’s dismissal as assistant coach did not sit well with Gillespie.

Starting on December 26, Pakistan will play South Africa in the baseball series, with Shan Masood leading the Green Shirts.

In the second Twenty20 International, Pakistan will try to bounce back against South Africa on Friday after the visitors were humiliated by the
Proteas.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Saudi Arabia will host the World Cup in 2034.

Published

on

By

Saudi Arabia will host the men’s soccer World Cup in 2034, while the 2030 edition will take place in Spain, Portugal, and Morocco, with additional matches in three South American nations, as announced by FIFA on Wednesday (Dec 11).

The announcement was made by FIFA President Gianni Infantino after a virtual special Congress. The World Cups of 2030 and 2034 each received a solitary bid and were both ratified by acclamation.

“We are expanding football to additional countries, and the increase in teams has not compromised the quality.” Infantino stated that it indeed augmented the opportunity for the 2030 World Cup.

“What more fitting manner to commemorate the centenary in 2030 than to host the World Cup across six nations, spanning three continents, featuring 48 teams and 104 remarkable matches?” The world will pause to commemorate the centenary of the World Cup.

“I extend my congratulations to all the bidders for their impressive submissions, but I wish to formally express my profound gratitude to the six confederation presidents and their teams,” he added.

The joint plan from Morocco, Spain, and Portugal will host the 2030 World Cup over three continents and six nations, with Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay organising commemorative matches to celebrate the tournament’s centenary.

Uruguay hosted the inaugural World Cup in 1930, and both Argentina and Spain have also organised the tournament. Portugal, Paraguay, and Morocco will serve as inaugural hosts.

In four years, Saudi Arabia will become the second Middle Eastern nation to hold the quadrennial event, 12 years after neighbouring Qatar held the 2022 edition.

In 2023, FIFA announced that the 2034 World Cup would take place in the Asia or Oceania area, with the Asian Football Confederation endorsing the Saudi candidacy.

Australia and Indonesia have engaged in discussions on a collaborative candidacy but subsequently withdrew.

FIFA declared that both bids would be unopposed in 2023, eliminating any uncertainty.

On Tuesday, the Norwegian Football Federation (NFF) announced its opposition to the acclamation of hosting rights and condemned FIFA’s bidding process as “flawed and inconsistent.”

CRITIQUE

Both proposals have faced criticism.

The choice to stage the 2030 World Cup across three continents has been criticised by climate activists due to the heightened emissions resulting from the additional travel necessitated.

FIFA has stated it will implement measures to “reduce the environmental impact.”

The 2034 candidacy by Saudi Arabia has faced criticism due to the nation’s human rights record and arid climate, similar to the scrutiny of the Qatar World Cup.

The climatic conditions in Saudi Arabia will probably necessitate that FIFA schedule the event during the winter months of the Northern Hemisphere, similar to the arrangement made in Qatar.

The World Cup in Saudi Arabia will ignite discussions on the Kingdom’s human rights record and provoke allegations of “sportswashing.”.

Amnesty International and the Sport & Rights Alliance (SRA) have implored FIFA to suspend the selection of Saudi Arabia as hosts unless significant modifications are declared prior to the vote.

The Kingdom has made substantial investments in sports in recent years; nevertheless, detractors, notably women’s rights organisations and LGBTQ advocates, assert that it is utilising its Public Investment Fund to obscure its human rights record.

Subsequent to Saudi Arabia being designated as the host of the 2034 World Cup, 21 entities, including Amnesty International, Saudi diaspora human rights organisations, migrant workers’ groups from Nepal and Kenya, and international trade unions, issued a collective statement denouncing the decision.

Steve Cockburn, Amnesty International’s Head of Labour Rights and Sport, stated on Wednesday that FIFA’s imprudent decision to grant the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia, without guaranteeing sufficient human rights safeguards, will jeopardise several lives.

The nation refutes allegations of human rights violations and asserts that it safeguards its national security via its legislation.

Saudi Arabia, having never hosted a tournament of this scale, must construct eight stadiums for the event.

“We anticipate hosting an extraordinary and unparalleled edition of the FIFA World Cup by leveraging our strengths and capabilities to delight football enthusiasts globally,” stated Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Abdulaziz bin Turki Al-Faisal, the Minister of Sports, declared it a momentous occasion for Saudi Arabia.

“The Kingdom is undergoing a significant transformation under Vision 2030, and today marks another substantial advancement that acknowledges our progress while anticipating an even more promising future,” he stated.

Continue Reading

Trending