Connect with us

Latest News

Judges’ letter: Supreme Court to reopen suo motu case hearing

Published

on

The Islamabad High Court’s six judges wrote a letter accusing the nation’s intelligence services of interfering in judicial matters. The Supreme Court has now restarted the case’s suo motu hearing.

Judges of the high courts will present their ideas for consideration to a six-member bigger bench led by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa during the showdown.

The high court judges have accused the nation’s intelligence agencies of interfering in judicial matters. Attorney General for Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Anwar is expected to respond to these accusations and offer recommendations.

The supreme court received proposals from judges of the Islamabad High Court and provincial high courts during the previous session.

These suggestions must be made public, per the court’s order.

A secret agency may use the AGP to file a response, the court said, if it wished to reply.

The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and other parties were also requested by the court to provide their responses with recommendations on the matter by May 7.

Justices Mansoor Ali Shah, Musarrat Hilali, Athar Minallah, Jamal Mandokhail, and Naeem Akhtar Afnan make up the six-judge panel that is presiding over the suo motu proceedings. Chief Justice Isa is not one of them.

Offers for IHC Submits

After six high court judges complained of suspected intelligence agency meddling in their cases, the Islamabad High Court convened a full court conference on April 27 and sent its recommendations to the Supreme Court.

Every single one of the IHC judges suggested that all high court, session, and civil court judges report to their senior judges in the event of any interference.

Under the guidelines, judges will be held accountable for wrongdoing if they do not report interference within seven days.

According to the guidelines, a session judge will receive reports from civil judges about incidents of interference, and the high court inspection judge will subsequently be notified. After then, the chief justice of the high court would be consulted by the inspection judge.

Whether to consider the subject administratively or judicially should be decided ultimately by the high court administrative committee, according to the judges’ proposal.

The administrative committee may also, given the gravity of the matter, submit the case to the entire court, and in the end, the high court may use its own judgment to address contempt of court in compliance with institutional agreements, as indicated in the recommendations.

JUDGES’ E-MAIL

A letter citing “interference of intelligence agencies in judicial matters” was sent to the Supreme Judicial Council on March 25 by six justices of the Islamabad High Court.

Mohsin Akhtar Kiyani, Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, and Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz were among these judges.

A full court hearing on the subject was alluded to by the Supreme Court in April when it took suo motu notice. Prior to it, Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, the former chief judge, refused to start any proceedings for the one-man inquiry commission that the federal government had established.

CJP Isa then asked all of the IHC justices for their opinions on whether the whole court should be called to discuss this important matter.

The proposals were drafted by the IHC judges jointly, following a conference called by Chief Justice Aamer Farooq last week.

Latest News

Man charged with raping mother-in-law who is deaf-mute

Published

on

By

The City A Division Police Station in Bahawalnagar is the place where a man has been accused of sexually abusing his 50-year-old deaf-mute mother-in-law.

The assault is said to have been carried out by the suspect while the victim was visiting her daughter. The woman was allegedly molested at night by the suspect, who allegedly took advantage of her medical condition.

The horrifying crime happened while the mother-in-law—who is deaf and hard of hearing—was visiting her daughter.

The victim’s daughter, who happens to be the suspect’s wife, reported the event to the police when it happened. The matter has been reported to the authorities, who have initiated an inquiry.

Continue Reading

Latest News

“Musharraf used the NAB for political agenda, dismissing the constitutional system.”

Published

on

By

A comprehensive 16-page written ruling on the government’s intra-court appeal concerning the nullification of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) statute has been made public by the Supreme Court.

The verdict, which was written by Pakistan’s Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa, reinstates the NAB changes and overturns the prior decision made by a two-member court.

The ruling explores the background of the NAB law, noting that it was passed by former army chief General Pervez Musharraf only 34 days after he had taken over via force. The court emphasised that Musharraf exploited the law to further his personal political goals and disregarded the democratic constitution.

The ruling mentions that Musharraf dismissed judges of the Supreme Court who disagreed with his unlawful acts.

Additionally, Justice Athar Minallah sent a message expressing his agreement with Chief Justice Isa’s decision. He emphasised that the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act did not accept the government’s appeal and that only appeals from parties who have been wronged are accepted.

He pronounced the previous ruling, which had annulled the NAB modifications, to be void and emphasised that judges and military personnel should not be free from NAB legislation.

The Supreme Court emphasised that there are clear functions for the legislative and judiciary under the Constitution, and they must take great care to avoid interfering with one another’s purview. It served as a reminder to both branches to carry out their constitutionally mandated tasks in service of the people. The judiciary—including the chief justice—is not the “gatekeeper” of parliament, the court emphasised once more.

As per the preamble draughted during the Musharraf administration, the court noted that the principal aim of the NAB law was to suppress corruption. Nonetheless, the court observed that it had been employed for political retaliation and manipulation, given that lawmakers who backed Musharraf were frequently found not guilty.

“The main purpose of the NAB law was political revenge from politicians or political engineering,” the decision noted.

It also mentioned the three noteworthy changes made to the NAB law:

June 22, 2022, saw the enactment of the first amendment.

On August 22, 2022, the second amendment was proposed.
“On May 29, 2023, the third amendment was ratified, following six hearings in which the court heard arguments opposing the NAB revisions.

Although the court did not go over the third amendment in any depth, it emphasised that laws should be preserved rather than being quickly overturned. It also made it clear that the interpretation that favours the legislation’s legality will prevail when two interpretations of the same statute exist.

The ruling stated that “the PTI founder’s petition and the old judgement of the Supreme Court were not according to the Constitution,” and it also stated that the court was not persuaded that the amendments were illegal in this particular case.

The PTI founder’s appeal was denied by the Supreme Court, which said it was not filed in a sincere effort. It further emphasised the fact that Imran Khan himself had proposed a large number of these changes.

needsIt was noted that the Practice and Procedure Act had been passed five months before the decision to change the NAB statute. Following that, the Supreme Court denied a request to establish a five-member bench to hear the petition challenging the modifications. A five-member bench needs to be assembled for the NAB amendments case, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah noted. The Supreme Court stated that the two-member bench would not have been able to hear or rule on the case against the NAB changes if Justice Shah had recused himself from the bench.

The Practice and Procedure Act hearings were postponed for 100 days and then resumed on September 18, 2023, according to the statement.

The court effectively reinstated the government’s earlier actions on the NAB statute when it stated in its closing remarks that the bill had been utilised for political objectives and that its amendments should remain.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Google Makes The Decision To Boost Investments And Back The Government’s Youth Skills Training Initiative

Published

on

By

 Prime Minister Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif was visited in Islamabad by a four-person Google delegation led by Mr. Scott Beaumont, President of the APAC area.

Pakistan’s digital economy is about to undergo a revolutionary change, according to the prime minister, who greeted the team. Speaking on the government’s intentions to reach the goal of US$ 25 billion in exports over the next five years, the prime minister revealed that funding will be used for youth training, IT infrastructure upgrades, and regulatory environment enhancements. Pakistan’s economy is being fully digitalised, he remarked. In his attempts, he stressed the need of working together with a tech behemoth like Google.

The Prime Minister praised Google for pioneering projects that have dramatically enhanced the lives of thousands of Pakistanis in recent years, as well as for its involvement in propelling the country’s digital economy closer to reality. Noting with satisfaction that Google has helped Pakistani young land about a million jobs in 2023 alone, the Prime Minister emphasised that this is a testament to both Google’s dedication to upskilling and empowering Pakistan’s youth and Pakistan’s potential in the digital marketplace.

Informing the Prime Minister of its future involvement intentions, Mr. Scott stated that Google has made the decision to support the government’s youth skill-training initiatives and to expand its investment footprint in Pakistan. He went on to say that for a values-driven digital firm like Google, the growing economy and the sizeable youth population are crucial for optimising the economic benefits of technology. He restated that Pakistan’s IT industry will undergo a revolution when five lac Chromebooks are produced there by 2026.

Continue Reading

Trending